Um dos motivos para escrever, sobretudo ficção, e
uma das dimensões políticas da escrita.
"But most of the writers I
talk to desire not to escape the world but to enlarge it, by extending
the possibilities of language. I think Amy Tan put it best: “The feeling I’m
talking about stems from the sense that we can never fully share the truth of
who we are,” she told me. “When I was six or seven, I used to read a thesaurus
searching for the words that meant exactly what I felt. And I could never find
them … When I had a feeling like sadness, I couldn’t find a word that meant
everything that I felt inside of me. I always felt that words were inadequate,
that I’d never been able to express myself—ever. Even now, it’s so hard to
express what I think and feel, the totality of what I’ve seen. But this
loneliness is the impetus for writing.”
In other words:
articulating these universal experiences is a way of combatting existential
loneliness, for both the writer and the reader. Anyone who’s truly loved a book
knows how it can shrink the numbing distance between us. But it’s more than
that. The attempt to speak where there’d been silence, or name a thing that had
no name, is inherently political—is revolutionary—because, in very real ways,
it expands boundaries: first of what can be said, and then of what can be done,
and finally of what is possible." — Why Write Fiction in 2017?, Joe Fassler
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário