.

O dia do meu aniversário do ano passado é uma nota vaga no meu moleskine, alguma lembrança de presente ou felicitação recebida, e os de outros anos eu mal lembro, a não ser os excepcionais, quando houve uma festa surpresa etc. Eu vou caminhando e pensando no meu aniversário, que é hoje, mas amanhã, penso, é outro dia e o dia de hoje já não será mais quase nada. Eu não consigo entender o sentido disso, do dia que vai passar, e pronto, e não sei, acho que não, se os humanos têm maneiras de compreender qualquer coisa que os transcenda, o tempo, o sentido, ou melhor, não sei se os humanos têm condições de entender qualquer coisa. A língua foi construída por nós e depois passou a nos construir, tudo o que se pensa, se explica, se narra, se imagina, se espera é delimitado pelo que é possível dizer. É o nosso universo, humano, não o universo. Todas as outras perspectivas estão fora do nosso alcance. Só conseguimos ver a partir de nossos próprios termos, dos signos que inventamos, do que é reconhecível a nós. Como, a partir daí, de nossos próprios termos, pensar questões que os extrapolam? Caminho. Uma fenda relâmpago que se abre causando vertigens em certas datas. Olhar a hora e esquecer segundos depois, tomar um remédio e logo em seguida não saber se o tomou, viver e desaparecer para sempre.

.

Sobre o riso

Looking at laughter from the perspective of an anthropologist, it’s possible to claim that all humour is essentially political. That insight transcends comedic forms such as satire; my point here is that humour in general, whatever its content, is political by nature. Down to the smallest details of our lives, our relationships and encounters involve exercises and exchanges of power. In the face of these dynamics, laughter is an equalising gesture, a restoration of a rightful order in the face of an unjust hierarchy.

Similarly, when we find something funny, it’s often because of some incongruity between mind and body, the ideal and the real. That division is political to the core. The humour of medieval carnival, according to Bakhtin, relied on the way that the body makes a mockery of the lofty purposes of the mind. Buttocks, thighs, coughs, splutters, farts, ‘the bodily lower stratum’ – all mock the spiritual solemnities of humourless bishops and other supposed guardians of morality. Comedy is about exposing the gap between our supposedly noble intentions, and the grimier truths about our condition. For this reason, the amusing features of life are never far away; if something seems funny, it’s because it’s uncomfortably close to home.

Perhaps this explains why nothing in nature can be truly comical. A strange rock formation or a pattern in the clouds might seem weird or intriguing, but it can’t be amusing; rocks and clouds don’t have human-style intentions and motivations, so they can’t be tripped up. Animals might seem funny, but only because we anthropomorphise them. They can’t really be brought down to earth, because that’s where they are already. For a situation to provoke genuine laughter, it must form a pattern that we recognise from our own mental and social lives.

Laughing, then, appears to be intimately tied to our ability to reflect back on ourselves. When we chuckle at our own foibles, we show that we are no longer trapped inside our individual egos, but can see ourselves through one another’s eyes. Likewise, when speaking, we separate ourselves from those around us by using words such as ‘I’ or ‘me’, drawing attention to ourselves as one person among others, as if from outside. Language would be impossible without the ability to adopt such a reverse-egocentric standpoint.

Humans are instinctive egalitarians, who work best with one another when no one has absolute authority, when teasing is good-natured, when there is sufficient affection and trust for shared tasks to constitute their own reward. Laughter is a vital part of this picture – not simply a psychological relief valve, but a collective guard against despotism. When moved to laugh by those around us, we reveal ourselves to be truly human.

— Chris Knigh, Does laughter hold the key to human consciousness?